Every template uses the SATHI structure with marked variables, a filled example, its review requirements and its privacy note. Teacher review before classroom use is always required.
The same content rebuilt with named accessibility features.
Template
{{BOARD}} Class {{CLASS}} {{SUBJECT}}, handout: {{HANDOUT_TOPIC}}; same content, two formats. Format A standard; Format B accessibility-first: sentences under {{WORD_LIMIT}} words, one instruction per line, numbered sections, key terms bolded once with margin glosses, an alt-text line for every image carrying its teaching point, tables with a single header row and a one-line summary. Conceptual level constant — simplify syntax, not the content. List the accessibility choices you made so I can verify each.
See the filled example
CBSE Class 7 History, handout: the Delhi Sultanate reading; same content, two formats. Format B: sentences under 12 words, numbered sections, bolded-once key terms with glosses, teaching-point alt text for both images, accessible table. Concept constant. List your choices for verification.
Review: Verify each named feature actually appears — AI sometimes acknowledges a feature without applying it. Offer Format B to everyone, unlabelled.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Concept watered down instead of syntax — the golden constraint must be stated · Alt text describes appearance, not the teaching point
Support, standard and extension versions that stay discussable together.
Template
{{BOARD}} Class {{CLASS}} {{SUBJECT}}, worksheet on {{TOPIC}}; same outcome for every version: {{OUTCOME}}. Three same-goal versions: one with a word bank and sentence starters, one standard, one with an extension that DEEPENS ({{EXTENSION_DIRECTION}}). Same core questions in all three so the class discusses together; no version labelled by ability anywhere on the page. Tell me which version you are least confident pitches right.
See the filled example
CBSE Class 6 Science, worksheet on the water cycle; same outcome: label the cycle and explain evaporation's role. Three same-goal versions: word bank + starters / standard / extension predicting what a dry summer changes. Same core questions; no ability labels. Tell me which version you're least confident about.
Illustrative: three aligned versions sharing five core questions; the AI flags the extension as needing an optional hint and supplies one.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Support tier quietly loses the analysis question — check the goal survived · Extension adds length, not depth
All example outputs are illustrative teaching fictions. AI drafts; the teacher remains responsible for accuracy, fairness, privacy and classroom fit.