⚠️ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada) content is governed and review-required. English fallback is shown where translations are pending reviewer approval.
Teacher Prompt Library
Reviewed, classroom-ready AI prompt templates
Every template uses the SATHI structure with marked variables, a filled example, its review requirements and its privacy note. Teacher review before classroom use is always required.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: 'Star of the month' style individual mentions creep in — collective-only is the rule
AdministrativePractitioner ~5 min Premium
Duty roster structure (roles, not names)
A fair rotation structure you fill with names offline.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Structures only; colleagues' names are added offline in school systems. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Asks for staff names — the structure-only rule prevents it
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. School consent rules override the template — align with office requirements first.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Cost or timing invented if slots left vague — fill every slot before generating
AdministrativePractitioner ~10 min Premium
Meeting summary from your own notes (names removed)
Structure your typed, de-named notes into decisions / actions / owners-by-role.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. The 'nothing added' rule matters most here — summaries must not invent agreements.
Privacy: Remove all names before pasting; use roles ('sports in-charge'). Confidential meetings are not summarised in external tools at all. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Invents an action nobody agreed — compare every line against your notes
AdministrativePractitioner ~10 min Premium
One-page staff summary of a circular
Reduce a non-confidential circular to obligations, deadlines and who-does-what.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. Verify every deadline against the original — paraphrased dates are how deadlines get missed.
Privacy: Public/non-confidential circulars only. Confidential documents never enter external tools. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Paraphrases deadlines — the verbatim rule exists for this
AdministrativePractitioner ~10 min Premium
Personal professional-development term plan
Turn two or three growth goals into a term plan with checkpoints.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Actions that assume free time you don't have — the fits-inside-work rule
AdministrativePractitioner ~5 min Premium
PTM invitation (bilingual, guardians-inclusive)
The parent-teacher meeting invitation with slot times and gentle framing.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. Back-translate the second language to verify rule parity (Module 7 habit).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Summons tone in translation — the partnership framing must survive both languages
AdministrativePractitioner ~10 min Premium
Report comment structures by performance band (no students)
Sentence frames per band you personalise offline — identities never enter the tool.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. Personalisation happens in your own document, never in the tool.
Privacy: Patterns only — no names, no identifiable performance data. Personalise offline. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Structures too generic to personalise — the three-sentence shape keeps them useful
AdministrativePractitioner ~5 min Premium
Resource inventory formatter
Turn a rough list into a reorder-ready inventory table.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Invents quantities for vague entries — vague entries should surface as notes
AdministrativePractitioner ~5 min Premium
Substitute-teacher handover sheet (no student data)
Everything a substitute needs to run your class — routines, not records.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Behaviour histories and named seating charts never enter external tools. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Tempted to add 'watch out for…' student notes — those stay verbal/in school systems
AdministrativePractitioner ~10 min Premium
Transform an unsafe admin prompt (three-grade check)
Audit your own intended prompt before sending — including the no-AI verdict.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version. The strictness instruction matters — a lenient audit defeats the purpose.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Suggests cosmetic anonymisation for red substance — the three-grade framing prevents it
AdministrativePractitioner ~5 min Premium
Weekly admin batching plan
Design your own 30-minute weekly green-task batch with saved templates.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-send review: every date/day/time/amount checked against the source; no unauthorised commitments; no personal data; the sent version is the reviewed version.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Marking or student-data tasks sorted green — the sorter must stay strict
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Assertion–reason items (board format)
Fact-cause connection items in the standard four-option board pattern.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: 'Reasons' that are true but unrelated — check the causal link is real
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Case-based question set with stimulus
A short stimulus (data/situation) with 2–3 questions sampling different levels.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Questions answerable without the stimulus — the 'everything needed' rule cuts both ways
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Clear exam instruction block
Unambiguous, student-tested instructions for any paper (bilingual optional).
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Multiple accidental errors per item — verify each has exactly one
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Marking moderation pack for a subjective question
Anchor answers at each level so two markers award the same marks.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Difficulty drift in variants — the invariants line lets you check the claim
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Peer-assessment protocol (two stars and a wish)
Structured peer feedback anchored to criteria, kept about the work.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Marking points that overlap — each point must be independently creditable
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Single misconception-revealing item
One diagnostic item whose wrong options each map to a named wrong model.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Options that fit multiple models — each must map to exactly one
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Six-defect audit of an existing test
Audit any test (AI- or human-made) for the six defect classes before students sit it.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: The AI's audit is a second pair of eyes, not the verdict — you confirm each finding; you solve the items too.
Privacy: Paste only the test content — never student responses or marks. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Misses key errors — this audit supplements, never replaces, solving items yourself
Assessment & feedbackPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Student self-assessment (I-can + evidence)
Outcome-wise 'I can' statements with an evidence line, in student language.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Reads like a test — the friendly framing must survive into the items themselves
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Concept-essential story for reading aloud
A story where the concept drives the plot — with discussion bridge questions.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held. Apply the test: does the story fail without the concept?
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Concept as decoration — the story-fails-without-it test · Moralising last line sneaks in
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Creative writing task with productive constraints
Constraints that spark originality instead of limiting it.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held. The no-model-answer rule protects originality — resist adding one.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: A 'sample' creeps in — the local-anchor + no-model rules are the safeguards
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Cross-age teaching project (older students make for younger)
Older students design learning materials for a younger class — authentic audience.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Frame too prescriptive about the product — format choice is the students' design decision
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Debate kit with asymmetric briefing packs
A contestable motion with different evidence per side — argument becomes necessary.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held. Verify both packs' evidence against the textbook; check the packs genuinely differ.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Symmetric packs — the flop rebuilt; check evidence differs · Motions touching student identity — forbidden
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Design challenge with trade-off constraints
Constraints that force choices; testable success criteria; reflection on trade-offs.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Criteria that need teacher opinion — 'testable' means measurable
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Gallery/museum walk with artefact cards
Stations of source/artefact cards with observation prompts — analysis on foot.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held. Verify any textbook-based source against the book; label fictional sources as fictional.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Invented 'historical sources' presented as real — fictional must be labelled
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Investigable vs non-investigable question sort
Teach students what makes a question testable — with a sorting deck.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Categories printed on the cards — the sort must be the students' thinking
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~5 min Premium
One-pager synthesis task (visual + verbal)
End-of-unit synthesis on a single page mixing sketch, quote and connection.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: 'Artistic quality' sneaks into criteria — completeness and own-words only
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Project frame (driving question to exhibition)
The full PBL frame: question, milestones, roles, criteria, exhibition.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Driving question too broad to own — it should fit in one sentence a student would say
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Simulation with private role sheets and scenario clock
A decision-rich role-play with timed injects and a debrief that lands the learning.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Roles with no real decisions — private sheets must create genuine tension · Debrief dropped for time — it IS the lesson
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Structured brainstorm protocol (quantity before judgement)
A class ideation session with rules that protect wild ideas.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Protocol collapses into open discussion — the phases and script keep structure
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Teach-back activity design (students as explainers)
Students prepare and deliver a micro-lesson to peers — deepest practice there is.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Planning card so detailed it writes the explanation — cards prompt, never script
Creative & inquiryPractitioner ~5 min Premium
What-if scenario set for discussion
Counterfactuals that stretch understanding beyond the textbook case.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the output contains NO conclusions or model answers where students must think; fictionalise any real-community setting; verify the stops-here line held.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: What-ifs needing untaught content — 'answerable from the taught concept' is the boundary
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Review: The construct is sacred: presentation changes, measurement does not. Verify item-by-item.
Privacy: Paste only the test content. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Simplifying a word problem changes the skill measured — check the confirmation lines
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Bias audit of a support version
Run the five failure patterns on an adaptation before it reaches students.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: The dignity test is final: if the adaptation would embarrass the student it serves, it has failed.
Privacy: Paste only the material — never information about the students it is for. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The audit softens findings — ask for one finding per pattern minimum
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Choice board for one outcome
A 3×3 grid of task choices at mixed depths, all serving the same outcome.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Some cells drift off-outcome — every task must evidence the same goal
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Concrete-pictorial-abstract ladder for a maths concept
The same concept staged through objects, drawings, then notation.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Jumps to notation early — the bridge sentences are the point
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Context-diversification pass on existing material
Rewrite word problems/examples so contexts include all your students.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the change-flags: the demand must be untouched; your students' own context should appear first.
Privacy: Paste only your own teaching material. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Changes the numbers along with the names — 'demand identical' is the rule
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Dyslexia-friendly reading passage
A reading passage restructured for decoding ease at the same content level.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page. Offer to the whole class — decoding-friendly structure helps everyone.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Simplifies the geography along with the sentences — watch the substance
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Early-finisher extension menu
Depth-adding extensions anyone may attempt — not just 'toppers'.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Extensions introduce next chapter's content — 'no new topics' is the boundary
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Language-supported version for EAL/ESL learners
Same task with pre-taught vocabulary, simplified syntax and glosses — same concept level.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page. Verify glosses against the textbook's own terminology.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Content demand drops with the language — state 'same conceptual level' explicitly
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Low-stakes participation structures for reluctant students
Participation formats that let hesitant students contribute safely.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Structures that still spotlight individuals — the no-forced-answer rule is the test
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Multigrade classroom parallel plan
One period serving two grade groups with alternating teacher attention.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page. Test the self-running work: could a student complete it with zero teacher input?
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: 'Self-running' work that needs the teacher — the worked-example-on-sheet rule prevents this
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Paired-reading roles for mixed abilities
Reader/coach role cards so pairs support each other without stigma.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Coach card becomes a corrector card — 'only when asked' is the discipline
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Scaffolded writing frame (fading support)
Sentence starters and paragraph frames that fade towards independence.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Starters that contain the answer — the structure/idea line matters
Differentiation & inclusionPractitioner ~10 min Premium
UDL options for one lesson (engage / represent / express)
Multiple means of engagement, representation and expression for the same outcome.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Check the goal survived in every version (same core questions); read all tiers aloud for equal-respect tone; no ability labels on any student-facing page.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The three expression routes get different difficulty — shared criteria keep them equivalent
Lesson planningPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Analogy bank for a hard concept
Three analogies with their breaking points, to choose deliberately.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Fading too fast — check the middle items genuinely carry one hint
Lesson planningPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Homework set that extends (not repeats) the lesson
Short homework that practises today's skill plus one connection question.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Creeps past 20 minutes — count minutes per item
Lesson planningPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Lab/practical session plan with safety steps
A practical period with stations, safety notes and a results table.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Solve every item yourself before trusting the key; check each item maps to a taught outcome; run the six-defect audit (ambiguity, keys, difficulty honesty, context bias, distractors, curriculum match).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Quiz skews to one chapter — demand an even mix
Lesson planningPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Story-based lesson for younger classes
A concept smuggled into a story, with the concept essential to the plot.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Your plan stays authoritative — accept notes selectively.
Privacy: Paste only your own plan content. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Rewrites the plan instead of annotating — restate 'without changing the plan'
Lesson planningPractitioner ~15 min Premium
Unit overview map (multi-lesson arc)
Plan a whole chapter as a sequence of connected periods before detailing any one.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: English column drafted first and Hindi squeezed to fit — the column order instruction resists this
MultilingualPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Bilingual vocabulary table for a chapter
The chapter's key terms with textbook-aligned second-language equivalents.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. Check flagged rows against the second-language textbook — invented coinages break exam alignment.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Sanskritised coinages no textbook uses — the flag-if-uncertain instruction surfaces them
MultilingualPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Classroom glossary wall cards (three languages)
Printable term cards honouring the languages your students speak.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. Have a speaker of each language check the flagged cards before printing.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Third-language equivalents invented — the flag-if-uncertain rule extends to every language
MultilingualPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Five-error audit of a bilingual document
The full translation-review pass on any bilingual material before use.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. The audit assists your judgement; a human reader of both languages makes the final call.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Script issues invisible in plain text — check the final printed/displayed medium too
MultilingualPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Natural code-switching explanation (as a teacher speaks)
Mixed-language explanation matching real classroom speech.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. Read aloud — if it doesn't sound like your classroom voice, adjust the register instruction.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Full translation instead of code-switching — 'as a teacher naturally speaks' is the instruction
MultilingualPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Reading-level parity fixer for a translation
Bring an over-formal translation back to the source's register.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Register fix drifts the meaning — the old→new diff is your check
MultilingualPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Rule-identical bilingual exam instructions
Instruction blocks where both languages state exactly the same rules.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. Check the back-translation line by line — 'any three' must round-trip as a choice.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: A choice becomes a command in translation — the back-translation exposes it
MultilingualPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Second-language explanation with preserved English terms
Exam-critical terms stay in English exactly as the board paper uses them.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Run the three parity checks: back-translation for meaning drift, terminology table row-by-row, read-aloud for register. High-stakes bilingual content needs a human reviewer of both languages before use. Spot-check two preservation-report rows — trust, but verify.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: A term silently translated mid-text — the report makes it visible in seconds
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Counterexample bank for a misconception
Three confrontations of different kinds, to choose the one your class feels.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Tells the failure instead of staging discovery — the question matters more than the example
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Grammar/language error pattern intervention
Noticing activities for language overgeneralisation (not error drills).
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break. Overgeneralisation is developmental — celebrate the rule-learning while noticing exceptions.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Prescribes drills for a developmental stage — the case distinction is the point
RemediationPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Home practice note after remediation (general, no data)
A general note to all families supporting the week's reteach — no individual data.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Goes to every family identically — check nothing implies who 'needed' the reteach.
Privacy: This note contains no student data by design — never adapt it per child in a public tool. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Wording that hints at strugglers ('some children…') — it goes to everyone, neutrally
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Post-remediation recheck (new surface, old-model distractors, transfer)
The recheck that distinguishes a rebuilt model from memorised answers.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Pre-commit your three decisions before administering: mastered → spaced review in two weeks; partial → second confrontation with a DIFFERENT analogy; unmoved → re-diagnose (the hypothesis was wrong).
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Reuses practised contexts — memory then passes for mastery
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Practice set at the failure point
Items that start exactly where the old rule breaks and force model choice.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: No coincidence items — without them students pattern-match the new procedure
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Reteach lesson plan (different route, same outcome)
A second full lesson using a different representation than the first attempt.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Reteach becomes recap — starting from the confrontation prevents this
RemediationPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Second analogy after a failed rebuild
A structurally different analogy when the first one didn't land.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: 'Different' analogies that are the same image renamed — structural difference is the ask
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Single-cause thinking intervention (humanities)
Move students from one-cause explanations to weighted multi-cause reasoning.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The web becomes decoration — the ranking + counterfactual do the cognitive work
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Small-group remediation station (while class works)
A 15-minute teacher-led micro-session run alongside independent class work.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break. Rotate station membership across topics so no group becomes 'the weak group'.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Class task needs the teacher mid-station — the worked-example rule keeps it self-running
RemediationPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Spaced review items (two weeks after remediation)
Three-item spaced check that catches quiet reversion.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The embedded item's context swamps the skill — keep it one-step
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Student error-analysis worksheet (fictional work samples)
Students diagnose planted errors themselves — remediation as analysis.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break. The fictional-student framing protects real students — never use real work here.
Privacy: All work samples are fictional by design — never paste real student work. Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The two flawed solutions blur together — the misconception vs slip distinction is the lesson
RemediationPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Which-model-is-it class quiz
A quick quiz whose distractor choices map the class's models for you.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify the counterexample and every answer key against the textbook — a wrong confrontation entrenches the misconception it was meant to break.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Options don't cleanly map to one model each — the tally becomes noise
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Age and cognitive-load review
Is this really pitched at the class — reading level, concept load, example fit?
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. This is a SECOND pass: your own solving pass still happens; disagreements resolve against the textbook, never the AI.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Both the key and the check can share the same error — the textbook is the referee
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Bias and inclusion audit of teaching content
Who appears, who is missing, who always leads — audited before students see it.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. Your students' own context appears first in the corrected version — check the flags.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Over-correction into tokenism — variety should read naturally, not as a checklist
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium
SAFE review record for one output
The documented review that makes approval a decision — capstone evidence format.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. The blank judgement lines are the design: the record documents YOUR decision.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: The AI fills in the verdicts — the blank-lines instruction keeps judgement human
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Source-quality ranking for a topic
Which sources should anchor teaching content — ranked with reasons.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. The prescribed textbook wins for exam alignment even where richer sources exist.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Web sources ranked above the prescribed text — exam alignment is the tiebreaker
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium
Three-version output comparison
Deliberate iteration: compare outputs from prompt versions and attribute differences.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. Save the version you approve — approval belongs to a version, not a prompt.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Attribution guesswork if you changed multiple things per version — one change per version keeps it clean
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium
Weekly verification drill (planted-error passage)
Keep your verification eye sharp with a self-test — errors disclosed after.
The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.
Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. A teaching drill for you — never present the passage to students as real content.
Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.
Known failure modes: Planted errors too obvious — ask for 'subtle' if the drill stops challenging you
All example outputs are illustrative teaching fictions. AI drafts; the teacher remains responsible for accuracy, fairness, privacy and classroom fit.