AISaathi
বাংলা (Bengali) content is governed and review-required. English fallback is shown where translations are pending reviewer approval.

Teacher Prompt Library

Reviewed, classroom-ready AI prompt templates

Every template uses the SATHI structure with marked variables, a filled example, its review requirements and its privacy note. Teacher review before classroom use is always required.

CategoryAll (120)Administrative (15)Assessment & feedback (20)Creative & inquiry (15)Differentiation & inclusion (15)Lesson planning (20)Multilingual (10)Remediation (15)Verification & quality (10)
LevelFoundationPractitionerAdvancedAccessFreePremium
Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium

Age and cognitive-load review

Is this really pitched at the class — reading level, concept load, example fit?

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Reading-level tools disagree with judgement — your knowledge of the actual class decides

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium

Answer-key cross-check protocol

A second solving pass on a key — supplementing (never replacing) your own.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. This is a SECOND pass: your own solving pass still happens; disagreements resolve against the textbook, never the AI.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Both the key and the check can share the same error — the textbook is the referee

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium

Bias and inclusion audit of teaching content

Who appears, who is missing, who always leads — audited before students see it.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. Your students' own context appears first in the corrected version — check the flags.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Over-correction into tokenism — variety should read naturally, not as a checklist

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium

SAFE review record for one output

The documented review that makes approval a decision — capstone evidence format.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. The blank judgement lines are the design: the record documents YOUR decision.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: The AI fills in the verdicts — the blank-lines instruction keeps judgement human

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium

Source-quality ranking for a topic

Which sources should anchor teaching content — ranked with reasons.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. The prescribed textbook wins for exam alignment even where richer sources exist.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Web sources ranked above the prescribed text — exam alignment is the tiebreaker

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~10 min Premium

Three-version output comparison

Deliberate iteration: compare outputs from prompt versions and attribute differences.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. Save the version you approve — approval belongs to a version, not a prompt.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Attribution guesswork if you changed multiple things per version — one change per version keeps it clean

Verification & qualityPractitioner ~5 min Premium

Weekly verification drill (planted-error passage)

Keep your verification eye sharp with a self-test — errors disclosed after.

The full template and filled example are available with a premium plan.

View plans

Review: Verify against real sources, never the AI itself; look up every citation; the approve/revise/reject verdict is recorded and yours. A teaching drill for you — never present the passage to students as real content.

Privacy: Never include student names, identifiable marks, health, family or community details. Describe situations and needs, never children.

Known failure modes: Planted errors too obvious — ask for 'subtle' if the drill stops challenging you

All example outputs are illustrative teaching fictions. AI drafts; the teacher remains responsible for accuracy, fairness, privacy and classroom fit.

💬Need Help?
AI Saathi is online.